fws
Specials
David Feldman mentioned in an article on SEC Rule 144(i) in The Corporate Counsel.
More>>
Larry Langs quoted in an article on making startups fit together in the Investor's Business Daily on January 23, 2009
More>>
December 2-4, 2009
David Feldman will speak on a panel at the PIPE Conference, sponsored by DealFlow Media, in Las Vegas on December 2-4, 2009
More>>
November 13, 2009
David Feldman will be a panelist at the Financial Executive Institute seminar entitled, "Where’s the Money? Finding Public vs. Private Capital Today."
More>>
fws
David Feldman's book, Reverse Mergers: Taking a Company Public Without an IPO, now in its third printing, was published in 2006 by Bloomberg Press (available on http://www.amazon.com). View David Feldman's reverse merger blog at www.reversemergerblog.com.
fws
David Feldman is a contributor to PIPES: Revised and Updated Edition - A Guide to Private Investments in Public Equity (Bloomberg Press, 2005) available on
http://www.amazon.com
.
fws
Dov Scherzer is the U.S. contributor to the British treatise, Internet Law and Regulation (Sweet & Maxwell, 2d Ed. 1997; 3d Ed. 2002; 4th ed. 2007),
Available Here.
fws
Dov Scherzer is the U.S. contributor to the British treatise, Electronic Signatures Law and Regulation (Sweet & Maxwell, 1st Ed. 2004),
Available Here.
 
David Feldman referenced in an article on the SEC proposed amendments to S-3 and Rule 144 in the Reverse Merger Report on July 12, 2007.
SEC Seeks Comments on S-3 and 144 Amendments
Just one month after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced sweeping changes to several regulations effecting reverse merger transactions; it has begun requesting comments on two of the six proposals: reducing the Rule 144 holding period for restricted stock in reporting companies to six months and allowing smaller companies to register shares for primary offerings using Form S-3.

The commission is still working on four other proposals, including the elimination of SB forms for smaller reporting companies, and a retooling of Regulation D. Each proposal will receive about 60 days for comment from the public.

The proposals have generally been extremely well received by reverse merger professionals, but many say that the amendments could still be improved. Ambiguity still surrounds how Rule 144 changes would affect shareholders in reverse mergers, which frequently include a simultaneous private placement. Several securities attorneys that RMR spoke with each offered up slightly different interpretations of the SEC's proposals and all said they would seek clarification in their comments to the commission.

Another gripe involves the S-3 amendment, which while offering access to expedited registration via Form S-3 for the first time to companies with less than a $75 million public float, also would restrict them from selling more than 20% of that float in an S-3 offering over any 12 month period. Shells would also be restricted from using S-3 for 12 months after they merge with an operating company, and would only be permitted to use S-3 for primary offerings.

A welcome addition to the proposals was a change to eliminate some restrictions under the commission's Worm/Wulff letters interpretation. Worm/Wulff has prevented certain restricted stockholders in shell companies from using Rule 144, and those securities had to be registered before being resold.

According to the proposal, shell stockholders could sell under 144 when their company ceases to be a shell, is subject to reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and when they've filed all require reports during the previous 12 months or other appropriate period. Most importantly, issuers would have to wait at least 90 days after filing current Form 10 information, typically found in a "Super 8-K."

One wrinkle in the Worm/Wulff reprieve surrounds the 90 wait. Some language seems to suggest the holding period begins on either the day the company filed the Form 10 information or when the securities were acquired, which is later. In the context of an APO, that would imply that private placement investors would have registered stock available to trade less than six months from issuance.

There is also some ambiguity as to whether affiliated shareholders will be treated differently than non-affiliates. Reverse merger specialist David Feldman, who has been in touch with the commission on the ambiguous wording, believes the SEC will apply a six-month holding period to all shell security holders to being on the "Super 8-K" filing date.

fws

Disclaimer: The information on this site does not convey legal advice of any kind. The transmission of this web site or communication with Feldman LLP via Internet e-mail does not by itself constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Feldman LLP and any party. Any information sent to Feldman LLP via Internet e-mail or through this web site is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis.
Attorney advertising is contained on this website. ©2009 Feldman LLP